China Will Soon Be Genetically Engineering Smarter, Sexier People

No matter how irreligious Germany gets, it shares with many Western European countries a common cultural heritage of Christian natural law thinking, especially about human dignity. This makes Germany queasy about things such as in vitro fertilization, surrogate parenting, embryo research, and pre-implantation genetic diagnostics. Some of these new technologies are banned, others allowed, all are regulated. It’s all a bit stuffy and old-fashioned, like the basement of an ecumenical summer camp building, with its ping-pong tables, disintegrating board games, and lukewarm cola.

China doesn’t share this heritage, increasingly doesn’t have to listen to the West’s lectures, and has little squeamishness about designing smarter humans:

China is spending hundreds of billions of dollars annually in an effort to become a leader in biomedical research, building scores of laboratories and training thousands of scientists.

But the rush to the front ranks of science may come at a price: Some experts worry that medical researchers in China are stepping over ethical boundaries long accepted in the West.

Scientists around the world were shocked in April when a team led by Huang Junjiu, 34, at Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, published the results of an experiment in editing the genes of human embryos.

The technology, called Crispr-Cas9, may one day be used to eradicate inheritable illnesses. But in theory, it also could be used to change such traits as eye color or intelligence, and to ensure that the changes are passed on to future generations….

“The consensus among the scientific community is, ‘not for now,’ ” said Huso Yi, the director of research at the Chinese University of Hong Kong Center for Bioethics.

Yet Chinese scientists seem in no mood to wait.

“I don’t think China wants to take a moratorium,” Mr. Yi said. “People are saying they can’t stop the train of mainland Chinese genetics because it’s going too fast.”

CRISPR is the stunning new gene-editing technique that makes editing animal and human genomes easy, precise, fast, and cheap. It may also allow us to resurrect extinct species.

Intelligence  is about 70-80% heritable, but is highly polygenic; we are only now beginning to isolate a few of the genes responsible for it. But research is rocketing forward so fast that it’s not out of the question to imagine genetic procedures to eliminate disease and boost intelligence within 20 years. When that happens, I am sure China will start doing it. After all, highly intelligent people are more orderly, more innovative, more law-abiding, and disproportionately responsible for economic growth and development. Once you set aside ethical quibbles, what's not to like?

If I had extra money lying around, I would invest it in (1) ultra-realistic Japanese sex dolls; and (2) Chinese genetic engineering. Those will be the growth industries of the next few decades.

3 thoughts on “China Will Soon Be Genetically Engineering Smarter, Sexier People

  1. So Glad to grasp it on a second thought that your dolls are probably meant to be fully inanimate objects, something made of plastic and elastic, or aren’t they?
    Anyway.
    It becomes more and more annoying for me to read your matter of fact statements about intelligence and heritability in these shortened “quips”.
    Please take another look at those two concepts and maybe start with the following hints:
    http://edge.org/responses/what-scientific-idea-is-ready-for-retirement
    (I read the book and haven’t verified if all contributions are online)

    Even if your impressive believe in those two concepts should turn out as a valid model of reality exactly as you presented them here, which should be doubtful, applied to genetic engineering: since when is it permissible (justified and maybe ordered?) to do the wrong thing if someone else might do those sinful things?

    “Once you set aside ethical quibbles, what’s not to like?”
    1. Those are not so simply discarded.
    2. Khan Noonien Singh.

    Like

  2. You should have quoted Sarrazin or Pirinçci, that would be more appropriate. It’s sad to see such an intellectual blackout at a rather insightful blog like this one.

    Like

  3. @Gutmensch: ‘intellectual blackout’ is a slogan, not an argument. I cited the latest reliable large-sample-size research published in respected, peer-reviewed journals to make my point. That’s pretty intellectual!

    If you have similarly reliable studies that disprove the points I made, please share them with us, I’d be glad to read them.

    But then again, I make this request every time, and nobody ever responds.

    Will you be the first, Gutmensch?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s